What is Growing Up Neglected
The report ‘Growing Up Neglected’ summarises the findings of six Joint Targeted Area
Inspections (JTAI) carried out between May and December 2017. The report analyses the
strategies and practice of the local areas in responding to older children (aged seven to 15
years) living with neglect. Read the full report.
The report identified five overall findings:
- Neglect of older children sometimes goes unseen (identification)
- Work with parents to address the neglect of older children does not always happen
(parenting work)
- Adult services in most areas are not effective in identifying potential neglect of older
children (adult services)
- The behaviour of older children must be understood in the context of trauma
(trauma-informed approaches)
- Tackling neglect of older children requires a coordinated strategic approach across all
agencies (coordinated approaches)
The report noted some examples of good practice, but overall found that practitioners did not
always understand or explore the potential links between neglect and other vulnerabilities,
and that it was often difficult for practitioners to engage with older children.
What were the findings in relation to identification
The report noted that practitioners often found it difficult to identify neglect amongst the older
age group. For younger children, potential indicators of neglect may be more obvious, for
example missing developmental milestones around speech and language or motor skills. Older
children may be experiencing less obvious forms, such as emotional neglect.
They may also experience forms of neglect that manifest in different ways; for example, a lack
of appropriate boundaries is a form of neglect which can contribute to a young person
engaging in offending behaviour. Inspectors found that where there are these kinds of
presenting issues, there was not enough professional curiosity about the underlying causes of
the behaviour. Older young people may spend more time away from home, which can mask
the impact of neglect, as well as increasing their exposure to other risks such as sexual or
criminal exploitation.
What were the findings in relation to parenting work
Inspectors found that there is often an unconscious assumption from parents and practitioners
that the presenting issues of older children are the sole problem, and their behaviour isn’t
considered to be a consequence of neglect, as above. This can result in parents not being offered
support or challenge either in relation to their parenting, or the different skills needed to look
after older children and adolescents. Without this parenting work taking place, inspectors noted,
work to address neglect and associated vulnerabilities has limited success.
What were the findings in relation to adult services
Inspectors found that adult services in most areas, including mental health, substance misuse
and probation services, were not effective in identifying older children at risk of neglect,
suggesting a lack of a whole-systems response. Services do not always think about the whole
family or the potential neglect of older children as a result of difficulties their parents face, and
probation services are not always identifying whether there are children linked to adult offenders.
However, inspectors did identify one adult substance misuse service where practice was
particularly strong in assessing the impact of adult behaviour on children, and their subsequent
analysis of and response to risk made a real difference to children and families.
What were the findings in relation to trauma-informed approaches
Inspectors found that there needs to be a greater understanding amongst practitioners of
children’s behaviour in the context of trauma. Many of the children whose cases were looked at
had experienced multiple forms of abuse and neglect, including exposure to domestic abuse,
physical abuse, sexual abuse and exploitation.
Research shows that long-term neglect and abuse can result in children repeatedly experiencing
trauma, leading to negative impacts on their emotional health and wellbeing, and in some cases
post-traumatic stress. In areas where staff had received training on the impact of trauma,
inspectors saw positive responses, for example: children’s need for therapeutic support to
address the impact of neglect and trauma was prioritised; practitioners understood why it would
take time to build meaningful relationships with children and why they may not trust adults; and
practitioners recognised the importance of giving older children some control of how
interventions were planned and delivered.
What were the findings in relation to coordinated approaches
Where there was a coordinated strategic approach across agencies to support a shared
understanding of the needs of neglected older children, inspectors observed a significant
difference in the quality of practice and experiences of older children. However, inspectors found
that a number of children’s plans were not effective enough; this was partly because there was
a lack of multi-agency challenge from partners when insufficient progress was being made to
address neglect.
Inspectors also noted that there were missed opportunities to include all agencies in work to
tackle neglect. In particular, poor dental hygiene is a key indicator of neglect, but dental
practitioners were not routinely included in strategic child protection work and did not have a
clear understanding of when they should refer concerns about children to the local authority. In
addition, in some local areas health practitioners were not involved at the early stages of child
protection decision making, which meant that valuable health information was not considered.
Printable version
